The High Road


Tonight, Israel faces a life-or-death decision.

Throughout the past few weeks, representatives of several parties (including Israel, “Palestine,” and the United States) have met in an attempt to “get the ball rolling” on fresh Middle East peace talks. These talks, regardless of their ultimate effect, have set the stage for a calm conversation about a subject that usually amounts to a screaming match.

Perhaps you believe that peace is possible. Perhaps you are a cautious skeptic. Maybe you are certain that comprehensive peace in the Middle East is out of the question. But most people will acknowledge that these talks are shaping up to be the closest thing to a “step” that the world has seen in a long time.

So, what is Israel’s life-or-death decision? Tonight at midnight, the disputed moratorium on Israel’s settlement construction in the West Bank ends. Palestinian negotiators have stated in unequivocal terms that the current peace dialogue will quickly become a hopeless monologue if Israel allows further construction in the West Bank. Peace Now— which dubs itself a “left-wing non-governmental organization”– claims that Israel has thousands of building projects set and ready to go. This leaves Israel with a quandary: muffle the dialogue, or take another “step.”

I’ve been to the West Bank.

One of the most sublime, peaceful weekends of my life was spent in the Gush Etzion settlement of Efrat. It’s not scary to live there or to spend time there. Walking around Efrat is a pleasure. It’s serene, almost like being in a suburb of Los Angeles. What’s scary is driving out of Jerusalem and into the West Bank (or vice versa). As you drive into the West Bank, gargantuan walls overwhelm you. “Why do I see giant stone dividers driving into your neighborhood?” I asked my host. Because during the Intifadeh, Arabs shot at Israeli drivers. They threw rocks and explosives. My host told me about an occasion when she had been driving with her children (who were very young at the time), and a bullet grazed her windshield. They were lucky. Other bullets, upon other cars, didn’t graze. It’s a reality that Israelis living in these neighborhoods must endure.

To me, one expression pops out in my mind. “Take the high road,” my mom has always said to me. Sure, in second grade, that Crayola marker was rightfully mine. But when Danny stole it from me, should I have let it go, or should I have fought and screamed until both of us were hostile and acrimonious? For those of you who missed out on your kindergarten teacher’s lesson on sharing, the correct answer is the former. Swallow your pride and take the high road.

Israel, you have the right to build your settlements in the most controversial spot on earth. But you could also build your apartments in Be’er Sheva, Eilat, Haifa, Sde Boker, Dimona, Karmiel, Hertzeliya, or anywhere else. Anywhere. To use economic terms, the ultimate cost to the peace process outweighs the immediate benefit to Israel; the utility Israel derives from pissing off the Palestinians. Continuing to build settlements in the West Bank is not a good idea.

Tonight, be the bigger man and swallow your pride.

Tonight, take the high road.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “The High Road

  1. The freeze was not just on building *new* settlements. It was on doing any kind of building in the territories. You couldn’t even add a bedroom to your already existing home. We are not talking about stopping Israel from setting up new towns. We are talking about telling hundreds of thousands of people that they can’t make changes to their homes in the way that people all over the world do all the time.

    Also, why put “Palestine” in quotes. The talks are between Israel, and U.S. and representatives of the Palestinian people.

  2. gleeful: The point to “taking the high road” is to do the right thing independent of the opposing party. I am skeptical that Palestinians will/would reciprocate with “high road” actions, but you can’t control their actions. You can only control your own actions.

    LAZionist: The term “Palestine” is in quotes because Israel is a country (recognized by the global community), and “Palestine” is not a place or a country. Palestinian nationalism exists, sure, but “Palestine” as a home for a people was invented by Yasser Arafat within the last thirty-something years.

  3. “Palestine is not a place or a country.”

    Honestly, brush up on your facts please. Palestine has become a recognized country since the Oslo Accords in 1993. Why do you think they have an Olympics team? Even though the 93 Accords fell out of favor after both parties signed, Palestine is still and internationally recognized country, and is especially recognized by the UN. While I agree with what you have stated, please do not denigrate your argument into triteness by remarks such as these.

Comment this Piece

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s